Showing posts with label 3-dimensional geometry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3-dimensional geometry. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Another Cone in a Sphere Problem? - A Guide for the rest of us...

Students who have been out of geometry for a year or so and are preparing for standardized test like Math I Subject Test or SATs/ACTS need occasional review. The following is similar to several other cone problems I've posed before but even our strongest Algebra 2 through Calculus students lose their "edge" when it comes to "solid" geometry questions (yes, believe it or not, my terminal course in high school was called Sold Geometry and we covered topics like spherical trigonometry!).


A right circular cone of height 16 is inscribed in a sphere of diameter 20. What is the diameter of the base of the cone?


Reflections....

1)  Are these kinds of problems somewhat hard merely because students forget? I can think of several more reasons:

  • The problem itself is somewhat challenging, however it's far from over their heads!
  • The student never experienced a question like this in Geometry; perhaps questions like these were in the B or C or D exercises in the text and were never assigned or only for the "honors" students? Do you recall seeing a problem similar to this in the textbook from which you taught?
  • The student did not take a formal course in geometry
  • The topic was covered in a cursory manner or perhaps not at all because of time crunch. That's the whole point of a standardized curriculum, isn't it? To know what is needed to be covered and plan accordingly. Of course, I'm  a realist enough to know the myriad of reasons why the best laid plans oft go .........
  • Students don't remember how to start because key geometry strategies were not explicitly stated and reiterated ad nauseam. Were your students asked daily to begin by reciting the key strategies such as those for circle and sphere problems? Were they placed on index cards or blocked out in a particular section of their notebook?:
    • DRAW THE BEST DIAGRAM YOU CAN (and believe me, I'm no artist!)
    • Always locate the CENTER of circles, spheres and label the point
    • Label the measurements of all segments (angles) - I know, everyone does that!
    • Successful problem-solving in mathematics is based on finding relationships! Were guiding/leading questions asked 
      • What do the cone and sphere have in common? 
      • TRUE  FALSE  The height of the cone is the same as the diameter of the sphere.  EXPLAIN!
    • Was the student exposed to the strategy of comparing the 2-dimensional analogue of the 3-D problem? Would it be a right triangle in a circle? Equilateral triangle inscribed in a circl or???  
    • Oh and yes... 
      • Draw the radius of the sphere (or circle) so that it is the hypotenuse of some right triangle!


"All Truth passes through Three Stages: First, it is Ridiculed... Second, it is Violently Opposed... Third, it is Accepted as being Self-Evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer (1778-1860)

You've got to be taught To hate and fear, You've got to be taught From year to year, It's got to be drummed In your dear little ear You've got to be carefully taught. --from South Pacific

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Challenging Geometry Assumptions: Review for SAT I/II

The video below presents a more challenging 3-dimensional geometry problem which would be at the upper end of SAT I or SAT II - Subject Tests (Math I/II). The key here is to challenge students' assumptions about a quadrilateral being a square because it has 4 congruent sides, a common error. This question will also review a considerable amount of geometry: Pythagorean Theorem, Volume of cube, spatial reasoning, 45-45-90 triangles, area of a rhombus, etc.


As always, the focus is on the art of questioning, suggested instructional strategies and pedagogy, although this problem may be interesting enough to capture the attention of some students who are preparing for upcoming standardized tests. For students who need help with spatial visualization, a model could be provided or have enough empty boxes available (they don't have to be cubes!).  

I strongly urge using learning partners or pairs for the discussion. 

Benefits include:
(1) Students feel less tentative when offering ideas to one other person or in a small group.
(2) Instead of posing conceptual questions to individuals, receiving little or no response except from the most confident or capable, you can pose a question to a learning pair: "Julie and Jason, what is needed to insure that ABCD is a square?" They should be given a few moments to think and confer before responding. The stronger student will usually explain it to the other. If neither can respond, they can say, "Pass!"
(3) The biggest advantage of student dialog is that often our explanations simply don't click with several students, but they do make sense to others. Those who "get it" can usually explain it in terms that their peers understand better, a benefit to both the "explainer" and the "explainee"!



By the way, the question posed near the end of the video is worth pursuing if time permits:

"Without calculating the areas, is the area of the non-square rhombus less than or greater than the area of the square?"

The answer is less for many reasons, but we would hope they would recall the base x height formula for a rhombus. The height is maximized when the angle between the sides is 90°. Why? Interestingly, the areas are quite close: 19.6 vs. 20. I believe strongly that this is the type of higher-order question that not only reviews important concepts but promotes deeper thinking, or should I say, thinking more than one inch deep!

What are your thoughts? Would you give students the e√3 formula before a standardized test or ever?Are these videos helpful to you? If you respond both on this blog and on my YouTube Channel, MathNotationsVids, and also rate these videos, that gives me the guidance I need to improve them.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All Truth passes through Three Stages: First, it is Ridiculed... Second, it is Violently Opposed... Third, it is Accepted as being Self-Evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer (1778-1860) You've got to be taught To hate and fear, You've got to be taught From year to year, It's got to be drummed In your dear little ear You've got to be carefully taught. --from South Pacific