Thursday, February 20, 2014

70a+19b=2838 SATs, Algebra, Number Sense and the Common Core

Click on link below to view video on YouTube. At this time I'm not embedding these videos in my blog.

Pls let me know if these screencasts are viewable on your desktop, laptop, tablet or phone. For now they have to be viewed in Portrait mode. The video quality is limited by my hardware and software at this time so the resolution is probably only fair.

Also any suggestions for improvement would be appreciated. If there's a particular problem or topic for which you'd like me to make a screencast let me know that as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KdVB8SARsM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Common Core SAT-type Quadratic Function Challenge Screencast

Tired of this yet? Well, the novelty of this screencast technology hasn't worn off yet for me!

One of my SAT students requested more practice with Quadratic Functions and coordinate problems so here it is...

Watch "SAT-Type Quadratic Functions Challenge Problem" on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb-eqlUNn4Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Monday, February 17, 2014

Sunday, February 16, 2014

30-60-90 Video Tutorial and Challenge Problem

I'll soon tire of these screencasts but I'm having fun doing these for now!

Watch 30- 60-90 video uploaded today to my You Tube channel MathNotationsVids.








If interested in purchasing my NEW 2012 Math Challenge Problem/Quiz book, click on BUY NOW at top of right sidebar. 175 problems divided into 35 quizzes with answers at back and DETAILED SOLUTIONS/STRATEGIES for the 1st 8 quizzes. Suitable for SAT I, Math I/II Subject Tests, Common Core Assessments, Math Contest practice and Daily/Weekly Problems of the Day. Includes multiple choice, case I/II/III type and constructed response items. Price is $9.95. Secured pdf will be emailed when purchase is verified.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

New video tutorials uploaded to MathNotationsVids YouTube channel

Haven't posted in awhile and haven't uploaded videos to YouTube recently. I now have the technology to make short screencasts. Here's a link to the latest video I posted, a typical medium- level standardized test question relating to a non- convex quadrilateral. As aways these tutorials are intended for both students and educators.
Your feedback is important to me. You can support my efforts simply by subscribing to my channel. Thanks...

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Cutting Corners -- The Square Transformed Into An Octagon Problem


A regular octagon is formed from a square by making 45° cuts from each corner.

(a) Draw a diagram or construct a model. See figure below.
(b) Since the octagon is "inscribed" in the square, its area is less than that of the square.
Explain using only "Euclidean" methods why the perimeter of the octagon is less than the perimeter of the square.

(c) If the perimeter of the square is 4 show that the perimeter of the octagon is 8(√2 - 1).

Note that the perimeter of the octagon is roughly 20% less than the perimeter of the square. Reasonable?


Saturday, January 4, 2014

Three congruent isosceles right triangles walked into a bar...

OVERVIEW
Silly title but you might want to try the following problem with your high school geometry students or with middle schoolers doing a unit on right triangles. Furthermore, elementary school children need many hands-on experiences with pattern blocks, tangrams, pentominos and the like to develop their innate spatial sense. They should also be allowed to experiment with two such triangular pieces to make a square, a parallelogram, a larger isosceles triangle, etc. Then have them work with the 3 triangles to make different polygons including the trapezoid. They don't need to consider the area or the 2nd part of the question.

THE PROBLEM
Three congruent isosceles right triangles are joined to form an isosceles trapezoid having an area of 3 sq units.

(a) Draw a possible diagram.
(b) Determine the perimeter of the trapezoid.

Answer: (b) 6+2√2

REFLECTIONS
•How much time would you allow for a discussion of this problem! 10 min? 15? 20? Guess it depends on whether you see this as just an exercise or as an activity.
• How much difficulty do you think most middle and secondary students would have with drawing an appropriate diagram?
•Do you think most will need to draw several figures before arriving at the isosceles trapezoid? Do you think some will come up with a trapezoid which is not isosceles and think they're finished? Can you anticipate that some will miss one of the key words like isosceles (which occurs TWICE!).
• Do you think the spatial "puzzle pieces" part of the problem is more significant than the numerical part or about equal?
• Do you expect some students to hit a wall and express something like "I forgot the formula for the area of a trapezoid!" We should make this a teachable moment -- "WE DON'T NEED TO RECALL THAT FORMULA! WHY!"
•Do you see benefits from students working in pairs here? Would you have them work independently then come together after a few minutes? My view is the stronger spatial student will "see" the correct figure more rapidly and influence the other who may give up and wait for his/her partner to draw it. So I might ask them to draw a few figures on their own for a couple of minutes.
•Do you think any of the older students need manipulatives?
• What is our role here? Catchphrases like"guide on the side" do not tell us what interventions we should actually use? Part of knowing what to do/say comes from our experience and part from instinct but my rule of thumb was "less is more". Allowing them to struggle for awhile is critical or, to put it another way, "without irritation there would never be a pearl!"
• How would you solve this problem? When planning do you feel it's important to think of alternate solutions or let this flow from the students?
•Finally, I think it's important to identify which of the  Mathematical Practice Standards are brought to play in this investigation. All of them? A couple? Guess that depends on you...

I typically get few if any comments from these detailed investigations. That's ok. Just planting seeds I guess...

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Reciprocals, Square Roots and Iteration -- The gift that keeps on giving!

OVERVIEW
SEASONS GREETINGS!
While gifting and regifting this holiday season, here's my gift to all my faithful readers without whom I'd have no reason to put finger to touch screen...
The following series of problems does not on its surface involve anything more than basic algebra, but it is intended to provoke students to reflect on the interconnectedness of number and algebra.
The extension at the bottom goes beyond what might be expected from the beginning of this exploration.
Math educators can adapt this for Algebra 1 through AP Calculus students...
THE PROBLEMS
What are the number(s) described in the following?
1. A number equals its reciprocal.
2. A number equals 25% of its reciprocal.
3.  A number equals twice its reciprocal.
4.  A number equals the opposite of its reciprocal.
5.  A number equals k times it's reciprocal. Restrictions on k? Cases?
Answers:
1. 1,-1
2. 1/2,-1/2
3,  √2,-√2
4. i,-i
5. k>0: √k,-√k; k<0: i√k,-i√k; k=0:undefined
OVERVIEW and much more...
• So why don't we just solve the equation x^2=k? See extension below for one reason.
• Why not ask the students what the graphs of, say, y=x and y=2/x have to do with #3. They might find it interesting how the intersection of a line and a rectangular hyperbola can be used to find the square root of a number!
• Extension to Iteration
Ask students to explore the following iterative formula for square roots:
(*) New = (Old + k/Old)/2
Have them try a few iterations for k=2:
x1=1 (choose any pos # for initial or start value; I chose 1 as it's an approximation for √2 but any other value is OK!)
x2=(1+2/1)/2=3/2=1.5
x3=(1.5+2/1.5)/2=17/12≈1.417 Note how rapidly we are approaching √2)
x4= etc
[Note: Plug in √2 into the iteration formula (*) to give you a feel for how this works!]
Students may want to explore further and they might be curious about where this formula came from, how it's related to Euler, Newton, Calculus and Computer Science. For example, they could  implement this on their graphing calculator or program the algorithm themselves!