HAPPY THANKSGIVING!
Alright, you're teaching about the rule for slopes of perpendicular lines in Algebra or Geometry.
Here are some of the instructional strategies or approaches you may have used...
(1) State the theorem without explanation followed by 3-4 demo examples of how it's used
(2) Motivate the theorem using the lines
y = (3/4)x and
y = (-4/3)x, choosing the points (4,3) and (-3,4) to demonstrate why these lines are perpendicular
(3) A more abstract approach using the following diagram
NOTE: Q(-b,a) is the point on line M in quadrant II. The label is too far from the dot!
FROM THE GIVEN INFORMATION IN THE DIAGRAM PROVE THAT ∠QOP IS A RIGHT ANGLE, THAT IS, LINES L AND M ARE PERPENDICULAR.
Comments
(a) If your group was advanced, would you omit the perpendiculars QR and PS?
(b) Would you draw the diagram to scale to prevent confusion for most students?
(c) Would you even consider Option (3) with a regular or weaker group of students? Would Option 2 be more than enough to get at the main idea?
(d) To more strongly suggest the use of slopes and/or similar triangles, would it be better to use the points (4,3) and (-6,8) on the lines? I personally would prefer this (and not give the equations of the lines). What do you imagine most students would do with this problem a few weeks (or even days!) later? Would they make the connection to slopes immediately if they had moved on to another unit or if this appeared on an assessment?
(e) Would some students need more than one example to suggest a generalization? Exactly what questions would you ask to promote a generalization?
(f) What have you done with this topic and/or how would you modify the above ideas??? The floor is open..
By the way, do you believe it is likely or unlikely that some version of this problem might appear on a standardized test like ADP's Algebra 2 End of Course Test or the SATs?